Precision
The accelerated — higher conviction, larger sizing, for the sophisticated trader.
Performance is disclosed separately for each stage. Backtested results don't predict paper-calibration results; paper results don't predict live-trading results. Stage transitions require admin step-up + a permanent audit-log entry.
Wealth creation over time
Compounded cumulative return per recorded trade. Slide the capital control to see what 73 trades would have grown to at your account size. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Who it's for
Precision is for the sophisticated founder who understands options risk and wants the strategy to push: larger position sizes, more trades on a day that warrants them, higher conviction. This is not a starter Sentinel. It belongs in a portfolio where you've already got a steady base and you're adding a deliberately more accelerated sleeve.
How it trades
Precision runs a fixed-rule SPX 0DTE iron condor strategy. The rule set is non-discretionary: open, manage, close, reassess. On an active session it executes up to 8 sequential positions, cycling one at a time — at any single moment the account holds at most one open position from this Sentinel. On days when filters aren't satisfied it stands down entirely.
Sample trade. {'setup': 'A session with enough movement to justify leaning in.', 'entry': 'Several entries through the day, each sized for conviction.', 'structure': 'SPX 0DTE iron condors — put spread below, call spread above, fixed-width wings — placed more assertively than the conservative Sentinels would, though still fully defined-risk.', 'size_at_50k': 'On a hypothetical $50,000 account, a larger contract count per trade than the anchor strategies use — Precision deliberately uses more of the available buying power.', 'max_risk': "Still bounded — spread width minus credit, times contracts — but the larger size means the defined worst case is bigger in dollar terms. That's the trade-off you're choosing.", 'outcome': 'On a representative day, several spreads expired worthless and the kept credit was the gain; on a worse day, an in-the-money spread takes a larger bite than it would with a conservative Sentinel. Higher conviction cuts both ways.'}
Entry/exit timing, strike-selection criteria, sizing rules, and filter thresholds are trade secrets and not disclosed.
Per-trade detail (today)
- WIN $8,878,772
- WIN $8,513,541
- WIN $9,790,664
Historical Risk Profile ▸ tap to expand
| Backtest window | 2016–2026 (10yr backtest, per_bot_sweep_harness, N=2, basis: composite-best) |
| Annualized return (CAGR) | 56.1% (model ideal — real-world expectations lower) |
| Max drawdown observed | 2.6% |
| Single worst day | -27.6% (one occurrence in ~10 years, during a major volatility event) |
| Win rate | 99.0% per-trade backtest · ~85% expected live |
| Sharpe (backtest) | 11.72 |
How this record is stored 4-LAYER TRV ▸ tap to expand
- Layer 1 · Live bot database — the bot writes each open and close to its own SQLite database on a Render persistent disk; survives container restarts and redeploys.
- Layer 2 · Platform canonical history — the public ledger you are reading (
data/precision_canonical_history.jsonin the open-source platform repo) — the public-tier projection, verifiable on GitHub. - Layer 3 · Internal full-tier archive — the same trades stored with every trade-secret field (volatility, signal score, strike levels, position size, reasoning) in the private
sovereign-trade-records-internalrepository — reconstructible audit trail for compliance review. - Layer 4 · Hash-verified snapshot archives — immutable point-in-time snapshots of the canonical record, written via
scripts/snapshot_paper_history.pywith SHA-256 hashes that detect any post-hoc edit. Each strategy-stage transition (paper → beta → production) freezes the prior stage permanently.
Calibration record
Every closed trade for Precision, most recent first. 73 trades recorded. Position structure, strikes, and decision triggers are trade secrets and not disclosed.
| Closed at | Stage | Outcome | P&L | Running total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-08 | Paper | Win | +$9,790,664.20 | +$262,577,547.54 |
| 2026-06-08 | Paper | Win | +$8,513,541.32 | +$252,786,883.34 |
| 2026-06-08 | Paper | Win | +$8,878,771.57 | +$244,273,342.02 |
| 2026-06-05 | Paper | Win | +$8,653,671.41 | +$235,394,570.45 |
| 2026-06-05 | Paper | Win | +$6,512,386.47 | +$226,740,899.04 |
| 2026-06-05 | Paper | Win | +$5,412,112.58 | +$220,228,512.57 |
| 2026-06-05 | Paper | Win | +$4,954,382.64 | +$214,816,399.99 |
| 2026-06-04 | Paper | Win | +$4,485,832.12 | +$209,862,017.35 |
| 2026-06-04 | Paper | Win | +$4,608,168.96 | +$205,376,185.23 |
| 2026-06-04 | Paper | Win | +$4,643,685.69 | +$200,768,016.27 |
| 2026-06-04 | Paper | Win | +$5,110,578.87 | +$196,124,330.58 |
| 2026-06-03 | Paper | Win | +$5,031,366.90 | +$191,013,751.71 |
| 2026-06-03 | Paper | Win | +$4,933,886.35 | +$185,982,384.81 |
| 2026-06-03 | Paper | Win | +$4,594,197.17 | +$181,048,498.46 |
| 2026-06-03 | Paper | Win | +$4,428,542.22 | +$176,454,301.29 |
| 2026-06-02 | Paper | Win | +$4,123,819.53 | +$172,025,759.07 |
| 2026-06-02 | Paper | Win | +$4,172,700.95 | +$167,901,939.54 |
| 2026-06-02 | Paper | Win | +$4,143,429.38 | +$163,729,238.59 |
| 2026-06-02 | Paper | Win | +$4,432,938.22 | +$159,585,809.21 |
| 2026-06-01 | Paper | Win | +$3,863,994.44 | +$155,152,870.99 |
| 2026-06-01 | Paper | Win | +$3,798,449.20 | +$151,288,876.55 |
| 2026-06-01 | Paper | Win | +$4,117,154.41 | +$147,490,427.35 |
| 2026-06-01 | Paper | Win | +$3,868,509.04 | +$143,373,272.94 |
| 2026-05-29 | Paper | Win | +$2,369,019.62 | +$139,504,763.90 |
| 2026-05-29 | Paper | Win | +$2,387,576.97 | +$137,135,744.28 |
| 2026-05-29 | Paper | Win | +$2,563,611.43 | +$134,748,167.31 |
| 2026-05-29 | Paper | Win | +$2,744,235.84 | +$132,184,555.88 |
| 2026-05-28 | Paper | Win | +$3,039,510.93 | +$129,440,320.04 |
| 2026-05-28 | Paper | Win | +$3,328,807.64 | +$126,400,809.11 |
| 2026-05-28 | Paper | Win | +$3,044,971.59 | +$123,072,001.47 |
| 2026-05-28 | Paper | Win | +$4,056,923.29 | +$120,027,029.88 |
| 2026-05-27 | Paper | Win | +$3,972,663.91 | +$115,970,106.59 |
| 2026-05-27 | Paper | Win | +$4,096,579.42 | +$111,997,442.68 |
| 2026-05-27 | Paper | Win | +$3,930,530.31 | +$107,900,863.26 |
| 2026-05-27 | Paper | Win | +$3,888,690.17 | +$103,970,332.95 |
| 2026-05-26 | Paper | Win | +$3,933,926.18 | +$100,081,642.78 |
| 2026-05-26 | Paper | Win | +$3,832,243.24 | +$96,147,716.60 |
| 2026-05-26 | Paper | Win | +$3,670,983.07 | +$92,315,473.36 |
| 2026-05-26 | Paper | Win | +$3,462,178.58 | +$88,644,490.29 |
| 2026-05-25 | Paper | Win | +$2,497,731.43 | +$85,182,311.71 |
| 2026-05-25 | Paper | Win | +$2,462,662.60 | +$82,684,580.28 |
| 2026-05-25 | Paper | Win | +$2,453,446.09 | +$80,221,917.68 |
| 2026-05-22 | Paper | Win | +$2,376,242.63 | +$77,768,471.59 |
| 2026-05-22 | Paper | Win | +$2,389,445.13 | +$75,392,228.96 |
| 2026-05-22 | Paper | Win | +$2,530,358.57 | +$73,002,783.83 |
| 2026-05-22 | Paper | Win | +$2,370,561.13 | +$70,472,425.26 |
| 2026-05-21 | Paper | Win | +$3,165,090.91 | +$68,101,864.13 |
| 2026-05-21 | Paper | Win | +$3,393,894.89 | +$64,936,773.22 |
| 2026-05-21 | Paper | Win | +$3,506,951.39 | +$61,542,878.33 |
| 2026-05-21 | Paper | Win | +$3,507,646.02 | +$58,035,926.94 |
FAQ
How fast-compounding is this Sentinel?
Accelerated — near the top of the family. Larger sizing, more trades, higher conviction. It's intended for experienced options traders, not first-timers.
What kind of drawdown can I expect?
The validated maximum drawdown shown here is among the higher figures in the family — and because positions are larger, a bad day costs more in dollars. It's a backtest observation, not a cap; live drawdowns can exceed it.
Can I run Precision with a conservative Sentinel?
That's the recommended way to use it — a steady anchor (Polaris, Genesis V1) as the base and Precision as the accelerated sleeve. Each is billed separately on its assigned capital.
What's different about this vs. Eli?
Both are in the accelerated tier. Precision's validated profile is concentrated cycling for conviction; Eli runs more cycles per active day with the family's highest validated annual return (45%) and one of its lowest validated drawdowns (1.79%). The structural difference is cycle density and sizing, not risk character — both are defined-risk on every leg.