Genesis V2 Heritage
The next evolution — the heritage engine, recalibrating through current market structure.
Performance is disclosed separately for each stage. Backtested results don't predict paper-calibration results; paper results don't predict live-trading results. Stage transitions require admin step-up + a permanent audit-log entry.
Wealth creation over time
Compounded cumulative return per recorded trade. Slide the capital control to see what 11 trades would have grown to at your account size. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Who it's for
Genesis V2 is the heritage multi-trade regime — a descendant of Genesis V1 that takes several positions on a day that supports them. It is currently in its open live calibration window. It's for the founder who wants the lineage strategy in its modern form and is comfortable reserving ahead of full availability.
How it trades
Genesis V2 Heritage runs a fixed-rule SPX 0DTE iron condor strategy. The rule set is non-discretionary: open, manage, close, reassess. On an active session it executes up to 5 sequential positions, cycling one at a time — at any single moment the account holds at most one open position from this Sentinel. On days when filters aren't satisfied it stands down entirely.
Sample trade. {'setup': 'A normal session with enough structure for the strategy to participate.', 'entry': 'Several entries through the day, each on its own merit.', 'structure': 'A sequence of SPX 0DTE iron condors — each a put spread below and a call spread above with fixed-width wings — staged across the session rather than all at once.', 'size_at_50k': 'On a hypothetical $50,000 account, a moderate per-trade contract count over several trades; the strategy is happier with more headroom.', 'max_risk': "Each trade's risk is the spread width minus its credit times contracts; the day's risk is the bounded sum.", 'outcome': 'On a representative day most of the staged spreads expired worthless and the kept credits net positive; an in-the-money spread trims that. The point of the open calibration window is to publish exactly how this behaves with live fills.'}
Entry/exit timing, strike-selection criteria, sizing rules, and filter thresholds are trade secrets and not disclosed.
Per-trade detail (today)
- LOSS −$280,621 — cycling cycle 1/11; fair theta-recalibrated (paper-artifact was $1,671,591.52)
- LOSS −$89,286 — cycling cycle 2/11; fair theta-recalibrated (paper-artifact was $1,353,893.28)
- WIN $160,284 — cycling cycle 3/11; fair theta-recalibrated (paper-artifact was $1,701,627.13)
- WIN $282,422 — cycling cycle 4/11; fair theta-recalibrated (paper-artifact was $1,751,556.46)
- WIN $570,369 — cycling cycle 5/11; fair theta-recalibrated (paper-artifact was $2,386,307.08)
- WIN $802,351 — cycling cycle 6/11; fair theta-recalibrated (paper-artifact was $1,875,367.06)
- WIN $1,054,016 — cycling cycle 7/11; fair theta-recalibrated (paper-artifact was $1,902,173.32)
- WIN $1,230,692 — cycling cycle 8/11; fair theta-recalibrated (paper-artifact was $1,867,162.75)
- WIN $1,359,418 — cycling cycle 9/11; fair theta-recalibrated (paper-artifact was $1,871,287.63)
- WIN $1,374,730 — cycling cycle 10/11; fair theta-recalibrated (paper-artifact was $1,610,490.31)
- WIN $1,480,135 — cycling cycle 11/11; fair theta-recalibrated (paper-artifact was $1,597,440.85)
Historical Risk Profile ▸ tap to expand
| Backtest window | 2016–2026 (10yr backtest, per_bot_sweep_harness, N=2, basis: directive-pinned, N=2 wins on 5/5 individual metrics despite N=3 having marginal composite edge of 0.7%) |
| Annualized return (CAGR) | 56.2% (model ideal — real-world expectations lower) |
| Max drawdown observed | 2.5% |
| Single worst day | -27.6% (one occurrence in ~10 years, during a major volatility event) |
| Win rate | 99.0% per-trade backtest · ~85% expected live |
| Sharpe (backtest) | 11.75 |
How this record is stored 4-LAYER TRV ▸ tap to expand
- Layer 1 · Live bot database — the bot writes each open and close to its own SQLite database on a Render persistent disk; survives container restarts and redeploys.
- Layer 2 · Platform canonical history — the public ledger you are reading (
data/genesis_v2_canonical_history.jsonin the open-source platform repo) — the public-tier projection, verifiable on GitHub. - Layer 3 · Internal full-tier archive — the same trades stored with every trade-secret field (volatility, signal score, strike levels, position size, reasoning) in the private
sovereign-trade-records-internalrepository — reconstructible audit trail for compliance review. - Layer 4 · Hash-verified snapshot archives — immutable point-in-time snapshots of the canonical record, written via
scripts/snapshot_paper_history.pywith SHA-256 hashes that detect any post-hoc edit. Each strategy-stage transition (paper → beta → production) freezes the prior stage permanently.
Calibration record
Every closed trade for Genesis V2 Heritage, most recent first. 11 trades recorded. Position structure, strikes, and decision triggers are trade secrets and not disclosed.
| Closed at | Stage | Outcome | P&L | Running total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | Paper | Win | +$1,480,134.77 | +$7,944,508.52 |
| 2026-05-12 | Paper | Win | +$1,374,729.78 | +$6,464,373.75 |
| 2026-05-12 | Paper | Win | +$1,359,417.73 | +$5,089,643.97 |
| 2026-05-12 | Paper | Win | +$1,230,691.91 | +$3,730,226.24 |
| 2026-05-12 | Paper | Win | +$1,054,016.06 | +$2,499,534.33 |
| 2026-05-12 | Paper | Win | +$802,350.95 | +$1,445,518.27 |
| 2026-05-12 | Paper | Win | +$570,368.64 | +$643,167.32 |
| 2026-05-12 | Paper | Win | +$282,421.71 | +$72,798.68 |
| 2026-05-12 | Paper | Win | +$160,283.95 | −$209,623.03 |
| 2026-05-12 | Paper | Loss | −$89,286.47 | −$369,906.98 |
| 2026-05-12 | Paper | Loss | −$280,620.51 | −$280,620.51 |
FAQ
How fast-compounding is this Sentinel?
Moderate, with a multi-trade cadence — busier than Genesis V1, not as far up the curve as Precision or Eli.
Why does it show 'pending live calibration'?
Genesis V2 is in its 30-trading-day live paper-trading window. We won't mark it 'complete' until that window closes; the record is published live in the meantime. Founders who pick it reserve ahead of public availability.
What kind of drawdown can I expect?
The validated maximum drawdown shown here is among the lowest in the family — but it's a backtest figure and the live window exists precisely because live results can differ. 0DTE options carry real loss risk.
What's different about this vs. Genesis V1?
Genesis V1 runs a conservative configuration; Genesis V2 runs a more active one on days that support them. Same lineage, more activity, recalibrated for current market structure.